Demographics details for Waterman, IL vs Bidwell, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterman, IL vs Bidwell, OH.
| Data | Waterman | Bidwell |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,427 | 200 |
| Median Age | 36.2 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $87,292 | $55,000 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Waterman vs Bidwell
- In Waterman, the population is higher at 1,427, compared to 200 in Bidwell.
- The median age in Bidwell is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 36.2 years in Waterman.
- Waterman has a higher median income of $87,292 compared to $55,000 in Bidwell.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Waterman and Bidwell at 50.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Bidwell at 10%, compared to 6% in Waterman.
- Bidwell has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.1% in Waterman.
Demographics
Demographics Waterman vs Bidwell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waterman | Bidwell |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 78 | 92 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waterman vs Bidwell
- In Bidwell, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Waterman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bidwell at 92% compared to 78% in Waterman.
- Both Waterman and Bidwell have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waterman at 10% compared to 1% in Bidwell.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waterman at 9% compared to 1% in Bidwell.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterman and Bidwell at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waterman | Bidwell |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 21.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.7% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterman vs Bidwell
- More residents in Waterman report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Bidwell.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waterman at 21.6% compared to 0.0% in Bidwell.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waterman at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Bidwell.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waterman at 18.7% compared to 0.0% in Bidwell.
- Obesity rates are higher in Waterman at 36.4% compared to 0.0% in Bidwell.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waterman at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Bidwell.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waterman | Bidwell |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (323) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 8.5% (122) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (221) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterman vs Bidwell
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Waterman and Bidwell at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterman hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 0.0% in Bidwell.
- More residents in Waterman have less than a high school education at 8.5% compared to 0.0% in Bidwell.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Bidwell.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.