Environment details: Waterloo AL
acceptable quality; few contaminants present.
Environment details: Sardis MS
quality is low, high sediment levels.
Compare Environment: Waterloo AL vs Sardis MS
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Waterloo | Sardis |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 867 | 504 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | acceptable quality; few contaminants present. | quality is low, high sediment levels. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.6 | 1.67 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 25 | 34 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Waterloo vs Sardis
- Water quality is rated higher in Waterloo at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in Sardis.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Sardis with an average index of 1.67 compared to 1.6 in Waterloo.
- Sardis experiences more days with poor air quality at 34 compared to 25 in Waterloo.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.