Demographics details for Waterford, CT vs South bend, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterford, CT vs South bend, IN.
Data | Waterford | South bend |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,276 | 103,110 |
Median Age | 45.2 years | 33.4 years |
Median Income | $74,701 | $49,056 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Waterford vs South bend
- The population in South bend is higher at 103,110, compared to 3,276 in Waterford.
- Residents in Waterford have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 33.4 years in South bend.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701 compared to $49,056 in South bend.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waterford at 34.0% compared to 28.0% in South bend.
- The poverty level is higher in South bend at 16%, compared to 5% in Waterford.
- South bend has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.7% in Waterford.
Demographics
Demographics Waterford vs South bend provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Waterford | South bend |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 25 |
White | 80 | 47 |
Asian | 5 | 2 |
Hispanic | 5 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waterford vs South bend
- In South bend, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 4% in Waterford.
- Waterford has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 47% in South bend.
- The Asian population is larger in Waterford at 5% compared to 2% in South bend.
- South bend has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 5% in Waterford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South bend at 10%, compared to 6% in Waterford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterford and South bend at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Waterford | South bend |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 14.0% |
Depression | 24.0% | 24.9% |
Smoking | 17.5% | 22.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 14.6% |
Obesity | 32.3% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterford vs South bend
- In South bend, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.7% in Waterford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South bend at 24.9% versus 24.0% in Waterford.
- South bend has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 17.5% in Waterford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waterford at 17.2% compared to 14.6% in South bend.
- South bend has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 32.3% in Waterford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waterford at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in South bend.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Waterford | South bend |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (17) | 1.2% (1,199) |
High School Diploma | 22.6% (739) | 14.9% (15,409) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (193) | 13.0% (13,380) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.8% (582) | 18.2% (18,716) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterford vs South bend
- In South bend, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Waterford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 14.9% in South bend.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South bend at 13.0%, compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- In South bend, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 17.8% in Waterford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.