Demographics details for Waterford, CT vs Sarasota, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterford, CT vs Sarasota, FL.
Data | Waterford | Sarasota |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,276 | 57,376 |
Median Age | 45.2 years | 49.8 years |
Median Income | $74,701 | $68,870 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Waterford vs Sarasota
- The population in Sarasota is higher at 57,376, compared to 3,276 in Waterford.
- The median age in Sarasota is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 45.2 years in Waterford.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701 compared to $68,870 in Sarasota.
- In Sarasota, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 34.0% in Waterford.
- The poverty level is higher in Sarasota at 10%, compared to 5% in Waterford.
- The unemployment rate in Waterford is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.3% in Sarasota.
Demographics
Demographics Waterford vs Sarasota provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Waterford | Sarasota |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 14 |
White | 80 | 60 |
Asian | 5 | 2 |
Hispanic | 5 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waterford vs Sarasota
- In Sarasota, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 4% in Waterford.
- Waterford has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 60% in Sarasota.
- The Asian population is larger in Waterford at 5% compared to 2% in Sarasota.
- Sarasota has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 5% in Waterford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sarasota at 9%, compared to 6% in Waterford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterford and Sarasota at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Waterford | Sarasota |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 10.9% |
Depression | 24.0% | 19.7% |
Smoking | 17.5% | 18.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 32.3% | 28.9% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterford vs Sarasota
- More residents in Waterford report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.3% in Sarasota.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waterford at 24.0% compared to 19.7% in Sarasota.
- Sarasota has a higher smoking rate at 18.1% compared to 17.5% in Waterford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waterford at 17.2% compared to 17.0% in Sarasota.
- Obesity rates are higher in Waterford at 32.3% compared to 28.9% in Sarasota.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waterford at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Sarasota.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Waterford | Sarasota |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (17) | 0.9% (529) |
High School Diploma | 22.6% (739) | 16.9% (9,677) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (193) | 10.9% (6,264) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.8% (582) | 30.5% (17,487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterford vs Sarasota
- In Sarasota, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Waterford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 16.9% in Sarasota.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sarasota at 10.9%, compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- In Sarasota, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 17.8% in Waterford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.