Demographics details for Waterford, CT vs Sandston, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterford, CT vs Sandston, VA.
| Data | Waterford | Sandston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,276 | 7,571 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $74,701 | $70,312 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Waterford vs Sandston
- The population in Sandston is higher at 7,571, compared to 3,276 in Waterford.
- Residents in Waterford have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 37.0 years in Sandston.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701 compared to $70,312 in Sandston.
- In Sandston, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 34.0% in Waterford.
- The poverty level is higher in Sandston at 9%, compared to 5% in Waterford.
- Sandston has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.7% in Waterford.
Demographics
Demographics Waterford vs Sandston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waterford | Sandston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 20 |
| White | 80 | 72 |
| Asian | 5 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waterford vs Sandston
- In Sandston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 4% in Waterford.
- Waterford has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 72% in Sandston.
- The Asian population is larger in Waterford at 5% compared to 4% in Sandston.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waterford at 5% compared to 2% in Sandston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waterford at 6% compared to 2% in Sandston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterford and Sandston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waterford | Sandston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.0% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 32.3% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterford vs Sandston
- More residents in Waterford report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Sandston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waterford at 24.0% compared to 0.0% in Sandston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waterford at 17.5% compared to 0.0% in Sandston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waterford at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Sandston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Waterford at 32.3% compared to 0.0% in Sandston.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waterford at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Sandston.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waterford | Sandston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (17) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (739) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (193) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.8% (582) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterford vs Sandston
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Sandston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 0.0% in Sandston.
- More residents in Waterford have less than a high school education at 5.9% compared to 0.0% in Sandston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Sandston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.