Demographics details for Waterford, CT vs Rushville, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterford, CT vs Rushville, NE.
Data | Waterford | Rushville |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,276 | 799 |
Median Age | 45.2 years | 42.6 years |
Median Income | $74,701 | $47,180 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Waterford vs Rushville
- In Waterford, the population is higher at 3,276, compared to 799 in Rushville.
- Residents in Waterford have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 42.6 years in Rushville.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701 compared to $47,180 in Rushville.
- In Rushville, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 34.0% in Waterford.
- The poverty level is higher in Rushville at 10%, compared to 5% in Waterford.
- The unemployment rate in Waterford is higher at 3.7%, compared to 2.5% in Rushville.
Demographics
Demographics Waterford vs Rushville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Waterford | Rushville |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | Data is updating |
White | 80 | 50 |
Asian | 5 | 2 |
Hispanic | 5 | 14 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 24 |
Demographics Comparison: Waterford vs Rushville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waterford at 4% compared to 0% in Rushville.
- Waterford has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 50% in Rushville.
- The Asian population is larger in Waterford at 5% compared to 2% in Rushville.
- Rushville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 5% in Waterford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rushville at 10%, compared to 6% in Waterford.
- In Rushville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 24%, compared to 0% in Waterford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Waterford | Rushville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 10.5% |
Depression | 24.0% | 18.0% |
Smoking | 17.5% | 19.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 21.0% |
Obesity | 32.3% | 44.1% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 31.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterford vs Rushville
- More residents in Waterford report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.9% in Rushville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waterford at 24.0% compared to 18.0% in Rushville.
- Rushville has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 17.5% in Waterford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rushville at 21.0% compared to 17.2% in Waterford.
- Rushville has higher obesity rates at 44.1% compared to 32.3% in Waterford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rushville at 31.0% compared to 17.0% in Waterford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Waterford | Rushville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (17) | 0.4% (3) |
High School Diploma | 22.6% (739) | 23.7% (189) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (193) | 17.3% (138) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.8% (582) | 21.9% (175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterford vs Rushville
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Rushville.
- In Rushville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 22.6% in Waterford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rushville at 17.3%, compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- In Rushville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 17.8% in Waterford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.