Demographics details for Waterford, CT vs Red river, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterford, CT vs Red river, NM.
| Data | Waterford | Red river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,276 | 539 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 43.3 years |
| Median Income | $74,701 | $49,479 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Waterford vs Red river
- In Waterford, the population is higher at 3,276, compared to 539 in Red river.
- Residents in Waterford have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 43.3 years in Red river.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701 compared to $49,479 in Red river.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waterford at 34.0% compared to 27.0% in Red river.
- The poverty level is higher in Red river at 12%, compared to 5% in Waterford.
- Red river has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.7% in Waterford.
Demographics
Demographics Waterford vs Red river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waterford | Red river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 80 | 89 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waterford vs Red river
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waterford at 4% compared to 0% in Red river.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Red river at 89% compared to 80% in Waterford.
- The Asian population is larger in Waterford at 5% compared to 0% in Red river.
- Red river has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Waterford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waterford at 6% compared to 2% in Red river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterford and Red river at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waterford | Red river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 32.3% | 27.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterford vs Red river
- More residents in Waterford report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.2% in Red river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waterford at 24.0% compared to 22.0% in Red river.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waterford at 17.5% compared to 15.8% in Red river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waterford at 17.2% compared to 17.1% in Red river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Waterford at 32.3% compared to 27.1% in Red river.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Waterford and Red river at 17.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waterford | Red river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (17) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (739) | 5.9% (32) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (193) | 6.7% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.8% (582) | 26.2% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterford vs Red river
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Red river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 5.9% in Red river.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Red river at 6.7%, compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- In Red river, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 17.8% in Waterford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.