Demographics details for Waterford, CT vs Fulton, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterford, CT vs Fulton, MO.
| Data | Waterford | Fulton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,276 | 12,710 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 33.9 years |
| Median Income | $74,701 | $59,544 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Waterford vs Fulton
- The population in Fulton is higher at 12,710, compared to 3,276 in Waterford.
- Residents in Waterford have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 33.9 years in Fulton.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701 compared to $59,544 in Fulton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waterford at 34.0% compared to 29.0% in Fulton.
- The poverty level is higher in Fulton at 10%, compared to 5% in Waterford.
- Fulton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.7% in Waterford.
Demographics
Demographics Waterford vs Fulton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waterford | Fulton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 9 |
| White | 80 | 86 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waterford vs Fulton
- In Fulton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 4% in Waterford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fulton at 86% compared to 80% in Waterford.
- The Asian population is larger in Waterford at 5% compared to 0% in Fulton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waterford at 5% compared to 3% in Fulton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waterford at 6% compared to 2% in Fulton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterford and Fulton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waterford | Fulton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 24.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 32.3% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterford vs Fulton
- In Fulton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.7% in Waterford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fulton at 24.3% versus 24.0% in Waterford.
- Fulton has a higher smoking rate at 24.7% compared to 17.5% in Waterford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waterford at 17.2% compared to 17.1% in Fulton.
- Fulton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 32.3% in Waterford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waterford at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Fulton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waterford | Fulton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (17) | 0.0% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (739) | 16.3% (2,077) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (193) | 16.9% (2,154) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.8% (582) | 14.7% (1,867) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterford vs Fulton
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Fulton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 16.3% in Fulton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fulton at 16.9%, compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 14.7% in Fulton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.