Demographics details for Waterford, CT vs Cresco, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterford, CT vs Cresco, IA.
| Data | Waterford | Cresco |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,276 | 3,940 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $74,701 | $60,135 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Waterford vs Cresco
- The population in Cresco is higher at 3,940, compared to 3,276 in Waterford.
- Residents in Waterford have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 39.5 years in Cresco.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701 compared to $60,135 in Cresco.
- In Cresco, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 34.0% in Waterford.
- The poverty level is higher in Cresco at 9%, compared to 5% in Waterford.
- The unemployment rate in Waterford is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.5% in Cresco.
Demographics
Demographics Waterford vs Cresco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waterford | Cresco |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 80 | 97 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waterford vs Cresco
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waterford at 4% compared to 0% in Cresco.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cresco at 97% compared to 80% in Waterford.
- The Asian population is larger in Waterford at 5% compared to 0% in Cresco.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waterford at 5% compared to 1% in Cresco.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waterford at 6% compared to 2% in Cresco.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterford and Cresco at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waterford | Cresco |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 19.0% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 18.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 21.5% |
| Obesity | 32.3% | 35.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterford vs Cresco
- More residents in Waterford report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.7% in Cresco.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waterford at 24.0% compared to 19.0% in Cresco.
- Cresco has a higher smoking rate at 18.1% compared to 17.5% in Waterford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cresco at 21.5% compared to 17.2% in Waterford.
- Cresco has higher obesity rates at 35.2% compared to 32.3% in Waterford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waterford at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Cresco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waterford | Cresco |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (17) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (739) | 28.3% (1,115) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (193) | 6.5% (258) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.8% (582) | 14.1% (556) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterford vs Cresco
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Cresco.
- In Cresco, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.3% compared to 22.6% in Waterford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cresco at 6.5%, compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 14.1% in Cresco.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.