Demographics details for Waterford, CT vs Clearlake, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterford, CT vs Clearlake, CA.
| Data | Waterford | Clearlake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,276 | 16,693 |
| Median Age | 45.2 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $74,701 | $41,047 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 7.2 |
Population Comparison: Waterford vs Clearlake
- The population in Clearlake is higher at 16,693, compared to 3,276 in Waterford.
- Residents in Waterford have a higher median age of 45.2 years compared to 38.6 years in Clearlake.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701 compared to $41,047 in Clearlake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Waterford at 34.0% compared to 25.0% in Clearlake.
- The poverty level is higher in Clearlake at 21%, compared to 5% in Waterford.
- Clearlake has a higher unemployment rate at 7.2% compared to 3.7% in Waterford.
Demographics
Demographics Waterford vs Clearlake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waterford | Clearlake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 4 |
| White | 80 | 48 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Waterford vs Clearlake
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Waterford and Clearlake at 4%.
- Waterford has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 48% in Clearlake.
- The Asian population is larger in Waterford at 5% compared to 1% in Clearlake.
- Clearlake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 5% in Waterford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clearlake at 13%, compared to 6% in Waterford.
- In Clearlake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Waterford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waterford | Clearlake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 21.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 17.0% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 32.3% | 37.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterford vs Clearlake
- In Clearlake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.9% compared to 16.7% in Waterford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clearlake at 24.7% versus 24.0% in Waterford.
- Clearlake has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 17.5% in Waterford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Waterford at 17.2% compared to 15.2% in Clearlake.
- Clearlake has higher obesity rates at 37.7% compared to 32.3% in Waterford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clearlake at 23.0% compared to 17.0% in Waterford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waterford | Clearlake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (17) | 0.6% (103) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (739) | 19.1% (3,190) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (193) | 25.8% (4,311) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.8% (582) | 5.3% (883) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterford vs Clearlake
- In Clearlake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Waterford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 19.1% in Clearlake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clearlake at 25.8%, compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.8% compared to 5.3% in Clearlake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.