Demographics details for Waterbury, CT vs Earlsboro, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterbury, CT vs Earlsboro, OK.
| Data | Waterbury | Earlsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 115,016 | 605 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 41.8 years |
| Median Income | $51,451 | $64,063 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Waterbury vs Earlsboro
- In Waterbury, the population is higher at 115,016, compared to 605 in Earlsboro.
- The median age in Earlsboro is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 36.7 years in Waterbury.
- Earlsboro has a higher median income of $64,063, compared to $51,451 in Waterbury.
- In Earlsboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 28.0% in Waterbury.
- Waterbury has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Earlsboro.
- The unemployment rate in Waterbury is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Earlsboro.
Demographics
Demographics Waterbury vs Earlsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waterbury | Earlsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 4 |
| White | 22 | 61 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 36 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 9 |
Demographics Comparison: Waterbury vs Earlsboro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waterbury at 28% compared to 4% in Earlsboro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Earlsboro at 61% compared to 22% in Waterbury.
- The Asian population is larger in Waterbury at 3% compared to 0% in Earlsboro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waterbury at 36% compared to 7% in Earlsboro.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Earlsboro at 19%, compared to 11% in Waterbury.
- In Earlsboro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 9%, compared to 0% in Waterbury.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waterbury | Earlsboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 41.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterbury vs Earlsboro
- In Earlsboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.3% in Waterbury.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Earlsboro at 24.9% versus 22.0% in Waterbury.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waterbury at 21.8% compared to 20.4% in Earlsboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Earlsboro at 14.6% compared to 13.7% in Waterbury.
- Earlsboro has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 37.1% in Waterbury.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Waterbury and Earlsboro at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waterbury | Earlsboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (2,221) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.4% (24,629) | 17.2% (104) |
| Less than High School | 20.7% (23,816) | 15.5% (94) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (12,745) | 11.1% (67) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterbury vs Earlsboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterbury have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Earlsboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterbury hold a high school diploma at 21.4% compared to 17.2% in Earlsboro.
- More residents in Waterbury have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 15.5% in Earlsboro.
- The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both Waterbury and Earlsboro at 11.1%.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.