Demographics details for Waterbury, CT vs Camp hill, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Waterbury, CT vs Camp hill, PA.
| Data | Waterbury | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 115,016 | 8,204 |
| Median Age | 36.7 years | 42.5 years |
| Median Income | $51,451 | $104,959 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Waterbury vs Camp hill
- In Waterbury, the population is higher at 115,016, compared to 8,204 in Camp hill.
- The median age in Camp hill is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 36.7 years in Waterbury.
- Camp hill has a higher median income of $104,959, compared to $51,451 in Waterbury.
- In Camp hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 28.0% in Waterbury.
- Waterbury has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in Camp hill.
- The unemployment rate in Waterbury is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Camp hill.
Demographics
Demographics Waterbury vs Camp hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Waterbury | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 2 |
| White | 22 | 82 |
| Asian | 3 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 36 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Waterbury vs Camp hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Waterbury at 28% compared to 2% in Camp hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Camp hill at 82% compared to 22% in Waterbury.
- In Camp hill, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 3% in Waterbury.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Waterbury at 36% compared to 5% in Camp hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Waterbury at 11% compared to 5% in Camp hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Waterbury and Camp hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Waterbury | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 12.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 28.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Waterbury vs Camp hill
- More residents in Waterbury report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 13.8% in Camp hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Waterbury at 22.0% compared to 20.4% in Camp hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Waterbury at 21.8% compared to 12.8% in Camp hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Camp hill at 17.3% compared to 13.7% in Waterbury.
- Obesity rates are higher in Waterbury at 37.1% compared to 28.8% in Camp hill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Waterbury at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Camp hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Waterbury | Camp hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.9% (2,221) | 0.6% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 21.4% (24,629) | 9.2% (756) |
| Less than High School | 20.7% (23,816) | 4.6% (381) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (12,745) | 41.3% (3,388) |
Education Levels Comparison: Waterbury vs Camp hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterbury have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.6% in Camp hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Waterbury hold a high school diploma at 21.4% compared to 9.2% in Camp hill.
- More residents in Waterbury have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 4.6% in Camp hill.
- In Camp hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.3% compared to 11.1% in Waterbury.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.