Demographics details for Water valley, MS vs South haven, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Water valley, MS vs South haven, MI.

Data Water valley South haven
Population 3,361 3,988
Median Age 35.8 years 61.0 years
Median Income $45,718 $63,202
Married Families 27.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 3.5

Population Comparison: Water valley vs South haven

  • The population in South haven is higher at 3,988, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
  • The median age in South haven is higher at 61.0 years, compared to 35.8 years in Water valley.
  • South haven has a higher median income of $63,202, compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
  • In South haven, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in South haven at 12%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Water valley is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.5% in South haven.

Demographics

Demographics Water valley vs South haven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Water valley South haven
Black 49 11
White 49 74
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 2 6
Two or More Races Data is updating 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Water valley vs South haven

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Water valley at 49% compared to 11% in South haven.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South haven at 74% compared to 49% in Water valley.
  • In South haven, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Water valley.
  • South haven has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Water valley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South haven at 7%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • In South haven, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Water valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Water valley South haven
Mental Health Not Good 18.2% 16.4%
Physical Health Not Good 13.8% 10.3%
Depression 22.0% 24.3%
Smoking 23.1% 16.4%
Binge Drinking 12.9% 18.0%
Obesity 44.0% 35.6%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Water valley vs South haven

  • More residents in Water valley report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South haven at 24.3% versus 22.0% in Water valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Water valley at 23.1% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South haven at 18.0% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Water valley at 44.0% compared to 35.6% in South haven.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South haven at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Water valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Water valley South haven
No Schooling 1.0% (34) 1.2% (48)
High School Diploma 24.0% (805) 16.0% (638)
Less than High School 13.0% (437) 11.5% (457)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.6% (322) 32.1% (1,279)

Education Levels Comparison: Water valley vs South haven

  • In South haven, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Water valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Water valley hold a high school diploma at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in South haven.
  • More residents in Water valley have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 11.5% in South haven.
  • In South haven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.