Demographics details for Water valley, MS vs Leitchfield, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Water valley, MS vs Leitchfield, KY.

Data Water valley Leitchfield
Population 3,361 6,432
Median Age 35.8 years 38.8 years
Median Income $45,718 $43,214
Married Families 27.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 3.2

Population Comparison: Water valley vs Leitchfield

  • The population in Leitchfield is higher at 6,432, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
  • The median age in Leitchfield is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 35.8 years in Water valley.
  • Water valley has a higher median income of $45,718 compared to $43,214 in Leitchfield.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Water valley at 27.0% compared to 25.0% in Leitchfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Leitchfield at 14%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Water valley is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.2% in Leitchfield.

Demographics

Demographics Water valley vs Leitchfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Water valley Leitchfield
Black 49 2
White 49 95
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 2 Data is updating
Two or More Races Data is updating 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Water valley vs Leitchfield

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Water valley at 49% compared to 2% in Leitchfield.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Leitchfield at 95% compared to 49% in Water valley.
  • Both Water valley and Leitchfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Water valley at 2% compared to 0% in Leitchfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Leitchfield at 3%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Water valley and Leitchfield at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Water valley Leitchfield
Mental Health Not Good 18.2% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.8% 16.7%
Depression 22.0% 30.0%
Smoking 23.1% 27.5%
Binge Drinking 12.9% 14.1%
Obesity 44.0% 41.5%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Water valley vs Leitchfield

  • In Leitchfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.2% in Water valley.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Leitchfield at 30.0% versus 22.0% in Water valley.
  • Leitchfield has a higher smoking rate at 27.5% compared to 23.1% in Water valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Leitchfield at 14.1% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Water valley at 44.0% compared to 41.5% in Leitchfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Leitchfield at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Water valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Water valley Leitchfield
No Schooling 1.0% (34) 0.3% (21)
High School Diploma 24.0% (805) 28.3% (1,821)
Less than High School 13.0% (437) 23.4% (1,504)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.6% (322) 8.4% (540)

Education Levels Comparison: Water valley vs Leitchfield

  • A higher percentage of residents in Water valley have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Leitchfield.
  • In Leitchfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.3% compared to 24.0% in Water valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Leitchfield at 23.4%, compared to 13.0% in Water valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Water valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.6% compared to 8.4% in Leitchfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.