Demographics details for Water valley, MS vs Glendale, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Water valley, MS vs Glendale, AZ.

Data Water valley Glendale
Population 3,361 252,136
Median Age 35.8 years 34.1 years
Median Income $45,718 $66,375
Married Families 27.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 3.6

Population Comparison: Water valley vs Glendale

  • The population in Glendale is higher at 252,136, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
  • Residents in Water valley have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 34.1 years in Glendale.
  • Glendale has a higher median income of $66,375, compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
  • In Glendale, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Glendale at 11%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Water valley is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.6% in Glendale.

Demographics

Demographics Water valley vs Glendale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Water valley Glendale
Black 49 7
White 49 28
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic 2 40
Two or More Races Data is updating 19
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Water valley vs Glendale

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Water valley at 49% compared to 7% in Glendale.
  • Water valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 28% in Glendale.
  • In Glendale, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Water valley.
  • Glendale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 40%, compared to 2% in Water valley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Glendale at 19%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • In Glendale, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Water valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Water valley Glendale
Mental Health Not Good 18.2% 18.4%
Physical Health Not Good 13.8% 12.4%
Depression 22.0% 20.2%
Smoking 23.1% 17.2%
Binge Drinking 12.9% 16.8%
Obesity 44.0% 32.9%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Water valley vs Glendale

  • In Glendale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 18.2% in Water valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Water valley at 22.0% compared to 20.2% in Glendale.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Water valley at 23.1% compared to 17.2% in Glendale.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Glendale at 16.8% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Water valley at 44.0% compared to 32.9% in Glendale.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Water valley at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Glendale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Water valley Glendale
No Schooling 1.0% (34) 1.7% (4,190)
High School Diploma 24.0% (805) 14.7% (37,119)
Less than High School 13.0% (437) 18.6% (46,911)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.6% (322) 14.2% (35,878)

Education Levels Comparison: Water valley vs Glendale

  • In Glendale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.0% in Water valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Water valley hold a high school diploma at 24.0% compared to 14.7% in Glendale.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Glendale at 18.6%, compared to 13.0% in Water valley.
  • In Glendale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.