Demographics details for Water valley, MS vs Danville, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Water valley, MS vs Danville, IL.

Data Water valley Danville
Population 3,361 28,472
Median Age 35.8 years 38.6 years
Median Income $45,718 $42,424
Married Families 27.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 20%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 8.6

Population Comparison: Water valley vs Danville

  • The population in Danville is higher at 28,472, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
  • The median age in Danville is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 35.8 years in Water valley.
  • Water valley has a higher median income of $45,718 compared to $42,424 in Danville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Water valley at 27.0% compared to 25.0% in Danville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Danville at 20%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • Danville has a higher unemployment rate at 8.6% compared to 4.3% in Water valley.

Demographics

Demographics Water valley vs Danville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Water valley Danville
Black 49 34
White 49 52
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 2 8
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Water valley vs Danville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Water valley at 49% compared to 34% in Danville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Danville at 52% compared to 49% in Water valley.
  • In Danville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Water valley.
  • Danville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 2% in Water valley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Danville at 5%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Water valley and Danville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Water valley Danville
Mental Health Not Good 18.2% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 13.8% 14.5%
Depression 22.0% 21.2%
Smoking 23.1% 23.9%
Binge Drinking 12.9% 14.9%
Obesity 44.0% 41.4%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Water valley vs Danville

  • In Danville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.2% in Water valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Water valley at 22.0% compared to 21.2% in Danville.
  • Danville has a higher smoking rate at 23.9% compared to 23.1% in Water valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Danville at 14.9% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Water valley at 44.0% compared to 41.4% in Danville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Danville at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Water valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Water valley Danville
No Schooling 1.0% (34) 0.9% (270)
High School Diploma 24.0% (805) 20.6% (5,853)
Less than High School 13.0% (437) 13.1% (3,727)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.6% (322) 11.7% (3,344)

Education Levels Comparison: Water valley vs Danville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Water valley have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Danville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Water valley hold a high school diploma at 24.0% compared to 20.6% in Danville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Danville at 13.1%, compared to 13.0% in Water valley.
  • In Danville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.