Demographics details for Water valley, MS vs Craig, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Water valley, MS vs Craig, CO.
| Data | Water valley | Craig |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,361 | 8,970 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $45,718 | $52,443 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Water valley vs Craig
- The population in Craig is higher at 8,970, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
- The median age in Craig is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 35.8 years in Water valley.
- Craig has a higher median income of $52,443, compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
- In Craig, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Craig at 10%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
- Craig has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.3% in Water valley.
Demographics
Demographics Water valley vs Craig provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Water valley | Craig |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 49 | Data is updating |
| White | 49 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Water valley vs Craig
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Water valley at 49% compared to 0% in Craig.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Craig at 71% compared to 49% in Water valley.
- Both Water valley and Craig have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Craig has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 2% in Water valley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Craig at 11%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
- In Craig, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Water valley | Craig |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 18.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Water valley vs Craig
- More residents in Water valley report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 17.2% in Craig.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Craig at 23.9% versus 22.0% in Water valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Water valley at 23.1% compared to 18.9% in Craig.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Craig at 19.0% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Water valley at 44.0% compared to 28.2% in Craig.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Craig at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Water valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Water valley | Craig |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (34) | 0.6% (52) |
| High School Diploma | 24.0% (805) | 24.1% (2,164) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (437) | 11.0% (990) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.6% (322) | 14.9% (1,338) |
Education Levels Comparison: Water valley vs Craig
- A higher percentage of residents in Water valley have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Craig.
- In Craig, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.1% compared to 24.0% in Water valley.
- More residents in Water valley have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Craig.
- In Craig, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.