Demographics details for Water valley, MS vs Cicero, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Water valley, MS vs Cicero, IL.
| Data | Water valley | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,361 | 81,919 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $45,718 | $64,325 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 6.4 |
Population Comparison: Water valley vs Cicero
- The population in Cicero is higher at 81,919, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
- Residents in Water valley have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 33.4 years in Cicero.
- Cicero has a higher median income of $64,325, compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
- In Cicero, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Cicero at 14%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
- Cicero has a higher unemployment rate at 6.4% compared to 4.3% in Water valley.
Demographics
Demographics Water valley vs Cicero provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Water valley | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 49 | 4 |
| White | 49 | -10 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 90 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Water valley vs Cicero
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Water valley at 49% compared to 4% in Cicero.
- Water valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to -10% in Cicero.
- In Cicero, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Water valley.
- Cicero has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 90%, compared to 2% in Water valley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cicero at 14%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
- In Cicero, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Water valley | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 15.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 16.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Water valley vs Cicero
- More residents in Water valley report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 15.3% in Cicero.
- Depression is more prevalent in Water valley at 22.0% compared to 16.8% in Cicero.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Water valley at 23.1% compared to 16.5% in Cicero.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cicero at 16.2% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Water valley at 44.0% compared to 36.8% in Cicero.
- Disability percentages are higher in Water valley at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Cicero.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Water valley | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (34) | 3.2% (2,662) |
| High School Diploma | 24.0% (805) | 19.6% (16,037) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (437) | 38.2% (31,314) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.6% (322) | 7.1% (5,829) |
Education Levels Comparison: Water valley vs Cicero
- In Cicero, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.0% in Water valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Water valley hold a high school diploma at 24.0% compared to 19.6% in Cicero.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cicero at 38.2%, compared to 13.0% in Water valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Water valley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.6% compared to 7.1% in Cicero.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.