Demographics details for Water valley, MS vs Bellflower, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Water valley, MS vs Bellflower, CA.

Data Water valley Bellflower
Population 3,361 76,405
Median Age 35.8 years 35.5 years
Median Income $45,718 $75,379
Married Families 27.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 6.2

Population Comparison: Water valley vs Bellflower

  • The population in Bellflower is higher at 76,405, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
  • Residents in Water valley have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 35.5 years in Bellflower.
  • Bellflower has a higher median income of $75,379, compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
  • In Bellflower, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bellflower at 14%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • Bellflower has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 4.3% in Water valley.

Demographics

Demographics Water valley vs Bellflower provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Water valley Bellflower
Black 49 13
White 49 -3
Asian Data is updating 12
Hispanic 2 62
Two or More Races Data is updating 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Water valley vs Bellflower

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Water valley at 49% compared to 13% in Bellflower.
  • Water valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to -3% in Bellflower.
  • In Bellflower, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Water valley.
  • Bellflower has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 62%, compared to 2% in Water valley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bellflower at 15%, compared to 0% in Water valley.
  • In Bellflower, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Water valley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Water valley Bellflower
Mental Health Not Good 18.2% 16.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.8% 12.1%
Depression 22.0% 15.9%
Smoking 23.1% 12.2%
Binge Drinking 12.9% 14.7%
Obesity 44.0% 30.2%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Water valley vs Bellflower

  • More residents in Water valley report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.1% in Bellflower.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Water valley at 22.0% compared to 15.9% in Bellflower.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Water valley at 23.1% compared to 12.2% in Bellflower.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Bellflower at 14.7% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Water valley at 44.0% compared to 30.2% in Bellflower.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Water valley at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Bellflower.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Water valley Bellflower
No Schooling 1.0% (34) 3.8% (2,888)
High School Diploma 24.0% (805) 15.5% (11,834)
Less than High School 13.0% (437) 28.9% (22,107)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.6% (322) 13.6% (10,396)

Education Levels Comparison: Water valley vs Bellflower

  • In Bellflower, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.8% compared to 1.0% in Water valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Water valley hold a high school diploma at 24.0% compared to 15.5% in Bellflower.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bellflower at 28.9%, compared to 13.0% in Water valley.
  • In Bellflower, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.6% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.