Demographics details for Watauga, TX vs Summerfield, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Watauga, TX vs Summerfield, OH.
| Data | Watauga | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,050 | 242 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 49.8 years |
| Median Income | $88,775 | $29,412 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Watauga vs Summerfield
- In Watauga, the population is higher at 23,050, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 35.8 years in Watauga.
- Watauga has a higher median income of $88,775 compared to $29,412 in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Watauga at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Summerfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Summerfield at 13%, compared to 10% in Watauga.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Watauga and Summerfield at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Watauga vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Watauga | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | Data is updating |
| White | 46 | 97 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 28 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Watauga vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Watauga at 8% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Summerfield at 97% compared to 46% in Watauga.
- The Asian population is larger in Watauga at 4% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Watauga at 28% compared to 3% in Summerfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Watauga at 12% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Watauga at 2% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Watauga | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Watauga vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.5% in Watauga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Summerfield at 24.2% versus 23.6% in Watauga.
- Summerfield has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 15.4% in Watauga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Watauga at 18.0% compared to 17.9% in Summerfield.
- Summerfield has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 33.1% in Watauga.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Summerfield at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Watauga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Watauga | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (166) | 1.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (4,050) | 31.4% (76) |
| Less than High School | 12.7% (2,930) | 17.4% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (3,869) | 2.1% (5) |
Education Levels Comparison: Watauga vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Watauga.
- In Summerfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 17.6% in Watauga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Summerfield at 17.4%, compared to 12.7% in Watauga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Watauga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 2.1% in Summerfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.