Demographics details for Watauga, TX vs Gillette, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Watauga, TX vs Gillette, NJ.
| Data | Watauga | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,050 | 3,251 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 41.0 years |
| Median Income | $88,775 | $145,000 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 62.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Watauga vs Gillette
- In Watauga, the population is higher at 23,050, compared to 3,251 in Gillette.
- The median age in Gillette is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 35.8 years in Watauga.
- Gillette has a higher median income of $145,000, compared to $88,775 in Watauga.
- In Gillette, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 43.0% in Watauga.
- Watauga has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 2% in Gillette.
- The unemployment rate in Watauga is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.0% in Gillette.
Demographics
Demographics Watauga vs Gillette provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Watauga | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 1 |
| White | 46 | 90 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 28 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 3 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Watauga vs Gillette
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Watauga at 8% compared to 1% in Gillette.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gillette at 90% compared to 46% in Watauga.
- Both Watauga and Gillette have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Watauga at 28% compared to 2% in Gillette.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Watauga at 12% compared to 3% in Gillette.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Watauga at 2% compared to 0% in Gillette.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Watauga | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 23.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 33.1% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Watauga vs Gillette
- More residents in Watauga report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Depression is more prevalent in Watauga at 23.6% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Watauga at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Binge drinking is more common in Watauga at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Obesity rates are higher in Watauga at 33.1% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- Disability percentages are higher in Watauga at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Watauga | Gillette |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (166) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (4,050) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 12.7% (2,930) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (3,869) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Watauga vs Gillette
- A higher percentage of residents in Watauga have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Watauga hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- More residents in Watauga have less than a high school education at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
- A higher percentage of residents in Watauga hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Gillette.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.