Demographics details for Wasilla, AK vs Summerfield, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wasilla, AK vs Summerfield, NC.
| Data | Wasilla | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,711 | 11,111 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 45.1 years |
| Median Income | $69,534 | $148,182 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | Data is updating | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Wasilla vs Summerfield
- The population in Summerfield is higher at 11,111, compared to 9,711 in Wasilla.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 45.1 years, compared to 35.9 years in Wasilla.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182, compared to $69,534 in Wasilla.
- In Summerfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 35.0% in Wasilla.
- The poverty level is higher in Summerfield at 7%, compared to 0% in Wasilla.
- Summerfield has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.
Demographics
Demographics Wasilla vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wasilla | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 74 | 82 |
| Asian | 3 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | 7 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wasilla vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Wasilla.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Summerfield at 82% compared to 74% in Wasilla.
- In Summerfield, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Wasilla.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Wasilla at 6% compared to 5% in Summerfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wasilla at 9% compared to 4% in Summerfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wasilla at 7% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wasilla | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 13.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 28.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wasilla vs Summerfield
- More residents in Wasilla report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wasilla at 23.2% compared to 22.6% in Summerfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wasilla at 20.8% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Summerfield at 19.5% compared to 18.3% in Wasilla.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wasilla at 35.8% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wasilla at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wasilla | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (109) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (2,051) | 8.8% (973) |
| Less than High School | 5.3% (514) | 6.1% (674) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.3% (1,288) | 38.9% (4,326) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wasilla vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wasilla hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Summerfield at 6.1%, compared to 5.3% in Wasilla.
- In Summerfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 13.3% in Wasilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.