Demographics details for Wasilla, AK vs Essex junction, VT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Wasilla, AK vs Essex junction, VT.

Data Wasilla Essex junction
Population 9,711 10,917
Median Age 35.9 years 39.9 years
Median Income $69,534 $92,589
Married Families 35.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 6%
Unemployment Rate Data is updating 2.5

Population Comparison: Wasilla vs Essex junction

  • The population in Essex junction is higher at 10,917, compared to 9,711 in Wasilla.
  • The median age in Essex junction is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 35.9 years in Wasilla.
  • Essex junction has a higher median income of $92,589, compared to $69,534 in Wasilla.
  • In Essex junction, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 35.0% in Wasilla.
  • The poverty level is higher in Essex junction at 6%, compared to 0% in Wasilla.
  • Essex junction has a higher unemployment rate at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.

Demographics

Demographics Wasilla vs Essex junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Wasilla Essex junction
Black 1 3
White 74 79
Asian 3 8
Hispanic 6 2
Two or More Races 9 8
American Indian 7 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Wasilla vs Essex junction

  • In Essex junction, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Wasilla.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Essex junction at 79% compared to 74% in Wasilla.
  • In Essex junction, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 3% in Wasilla.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Wasilla at 6% compared to 2% in Essex junction.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Wasilla at 9% compared to 8% in Essex junction.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wasilla at 7% compared to 0% in Essex junction.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Wasilla Essex junction
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 8.1%
Depression 23.2% 27.1%
Smoking 20.8% 11.8%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 20.9%
Obesity 35.8% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Wasilla vs Essex junction

  • More residents in Wasilla report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.1% in Essex junction.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Essex junction at 27.1% versus 23.2% in Wasilla.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Wasilla at 20.8% compared to 11.8% in Essex junction.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Essex junction at 20.9% compared to 18.3% in Wasilla.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Wasilla at 35.8% compared to 26.4% in Essex junction.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Wasilla at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Essex junction.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Wasilla Essex junction
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.5% (162)
High School Diploma 21.1% (2,051) 8.2% (899)
Less than High School 5.3% (514) 8.8% (966)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.3% (1,288) 34.3% (3,742)

Education Levels Comparison: Wasilla vs Essex junction

  • In Essex junction, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Wasilla hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 8.2% in Essex junction.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Essex junction at 8.8%, compared to 5.3% in Wasilla.
  • In Essex junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.3% compared to 13.3% in Wasilla.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.