Demographics details for Wasilla, AK vs Clarksville, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wasilla, AK vs Clarksville, AR.
| Data | Wasilla | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,711 | 9,555 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $69,534 | $35,911 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | Data is updating | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Wasilla vs Clarksville
- In Wasilla, the population is higher at 9,711, compared to 9,555 in Clarksville.
- Residents in Wasilla have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 35.3 years in Clarksville.
- Wasilla has a higher median income of $69,534 compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
- In Clarksville, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Wasilla.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksville at 18%, compared to 0% in Wasilla.
- Clarksville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.
Demographics
Demographics Wasilla vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wasilla | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 74 | 60 |
| Asian | 3 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 7 |
| American Indian | 7 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Wasilla vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Wasilla.
- Wasilla has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 60% in Clarksville.
- In Clarksville, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 3% in Wasilla.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 6% in Wasilla.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wasilla at 9% compared to 7% in Clarksville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wasilla at 7% compared to 1% in Clarksville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wasilla | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 21.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 16.3% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 27.9% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wasilla vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 17.2% in Wasilla.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksville at 27.9% versus 23.2% in Wasilla.
- Clarksville has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 20.8% in Wasilla.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wasilla at 18.3% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 35.8% in Wasilla.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksville at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Wasilla.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wasilla | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 4.2% (402) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (2,051) | 21.6% (2,064) |
| Less than High School | 5.3% (514) | 28.6% (2,735) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.3% (1,288) | 8.2% (786) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wasilla vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.
- In Clarksville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 21.1% in Wasilla.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksville at 28.6%, compared to 5.3% in Wasilla.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wasilla hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.3% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.