Demographics details for Wasilla, AK vs Beaverdam, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Wasilla, AK vs Beaverdam, VA.
| Data | Wasilla | Beaverdam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,711 | 14,809 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 45.4 years |
| Median Income | $69,534 | $110,208 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | Data is updating | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Wasilla vs Beaverdam
- The population in Beaverdam is higher at 14,809, compared to 9,711 in Wasilla.
- The median age in Beaverdam is higher at 45.4 years, compared to 35.9 years in Wasilla.
- Beaverdam has a higher median income of $110,208, compared to $69,534 in Wasilla.
- In Beaverdam, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 35.0% in Wasilla.
- The poverty level is higher in Beaverdam at 5%, compared to 0% in Wasilla.
- Beaverdam has a higher unemployment rate at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.
Demographics
Demographics Wasilla vs Beaverdam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Wasilla | Beaverdam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 9 |
| White | 74 | 78 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
| American Indian | 7 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Wasilla vs Beaverdam
- In Beaverdam, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Wasilla.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaverdam at 78% compared to 74% in Wasilla.
- The Asian population is larger in Wasilla at 3% compared to 1% in Beaverdam.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Wasilla and Beaverdam at 6%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Wasilla at 9% compared to 6% in Beaverdam.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Wasilla at 7% compared to 0% in Beaverdam.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Wasilla | Beaverdam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 23.2% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Wasilla vs Beaverdam
- More residents in Wasilla report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Wasilla at 23.2% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Wasilla at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Wasilla at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
- Obesity rates are higher in Wasilla at 35.8% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Wasilla at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Beaverdam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Wasilla | Beaverdam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.0% (151) |
| High School Diploma | 21.1% (2,051) | 16.6% (2,455) |
| Less than High School | 5.3% (514) | 7.5% (1,117) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.3% (1,288) | 33.8% (5,006) |
Education Levels Comparison: Wasilla vs Beaverdam
- In Beaverdam, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Wasilla.
- A higher percentage of residents in Wasilla hold a high school diploma at 21.1% compared to 16.6% in Beaverdam.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaverdam at 7.5%, compared to 5.3% in Wasilla.
- In Beaverdam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.8% compared to 13.3% in Wasilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.