Demographics details for Washington, NC vs Port lavaca, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, NC vs Port lavaca, TX.
| Data | Washington | Port lavaca |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,828 | 11,262 |
| Median Age | 48.0 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $38,927 | $58,871 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Port lavaca
- The population in Port lavaca is higher at 11,262, compared to 10,828 in Washington.
- Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 48.0 years compared to 34.8 years in Port lavaca.
- Port lavaca has a higher median income of $58,871, compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- In Port lavaca, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Port lavaca.
- The unemployment rate in Washington is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.2% in Port lavaca.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Port lavaca provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washington | Port lavaca |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 49 | 5 |
| White | 41 | 6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 64 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Port lavaca
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Washington at 49% compared to 5% in Port lavaca.
- Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 41% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
- In Port lavaca, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Washington.
- Port lavaca has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 6% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port lavaca at 18%, compared to 3% in Washington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Washington at 1% compared to 0% in Port lavaca.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washington | Port lavaca |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 21.5% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 43.3% | 38.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Port lavaca
- More residents in Washington report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.3% in Port lavaca.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 22.8% compared to 21.5% in Port lavaca.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 21.9% compared to 17.5% in Port lavaca.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Port lavaca at 16.9% compared to 14.7% in Washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 43.3% compared to 38.4% in Port lavaca.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 24.0% compared to 18.0% in Port lavaca.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washington | Port lavaca |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (128) | 2.0% (230) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (2,058) | 21.3% (2,404) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (1,487) | 24.2% (2,728) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (1,118) | 9.7% (1,091) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Port lavaca
- In Port lavaca, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.2% in Washington.
- In Port lavaca, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.3% compared to 19.0% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port lavaca at 24.2%, compared to 13.7% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.