Demographics details for Washington, NC vs Fort payne, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, NC vs Fort payne, AL.
| Data | Washington | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,828 | 14,879 |
| Median Age | 48.0 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $38,927 | $44,549 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Fort payne
- The population in Fort payne is higher at 14,879, compared to 10,828 in Washington.
- Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 48.0 years compared to 39.7 years in Fort payne.
- Fort payne has a higher median income of $44,549, compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- In Fort payne, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 11% in Fort payne.
- The unemployment rate in Washington is higher at 4.8%, compared to 2.5% in Fort payne.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Fort payne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washington | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 49 | 2 |
| White | 41 | 72 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Fort payne
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Washington at 49% compared to 2% in Fort payne.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort payne at 72% compared to 41% in Washington.
- Both Washington and Fort payne have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fort payne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 6% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort payne at 4%, compared to 3% in Washington.
- In Fort payne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washington | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 21.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 16.1% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 26.0% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 43.3% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Fort payne
- In Fort payne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 18.3% in Washington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort payne at 26.0% versus 22.8% in Washington.
- Fort payne has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 21.9% in Washington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 14.7% compared to 14.3% in Fort payne.
- Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 43.3% compared to 41.8% in Fort payne.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 24.0% compared to 13.0% in Fort payne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washington | Fort payne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (128) | 2.7% (402) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (2,058) | 14.2% (2,110) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (1,487) | 27.9% (4,155) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (1,118) | 11.9% (1,767) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Fort payne
- In Fort payne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.2% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 14.2% in Fort payne.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort payne at 27.9%, compared to 13.7% in Washington.
- In Fort payne, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 10.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.