Demographics details for Washington, NC vs Dearborn, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, NC vs Dearborn, MI.
| Data | Washington | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,828 | 107,710 |
| Median Age | 48.0 years | 32.3 years |
| Median Income | $38,927 | $64,600 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Dearborn
- The population in Dearborn is higher at 107,710, compared to 10,828 in Washington.
- Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 48.0 years compared to 32.3 years in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher median income of $64,600, compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- In Dearborn, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 12% in Dearborn.
- The unemployment rate in Washington is higher at 4.8%, compared to 4.1% in Dearborn.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Dearborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washington | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 49 | 3 |
| White | 41 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Dearborn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Washington at 49% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dearborn at 86% compared to 41% in Washington.
- In Dearborn, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Washington at 6% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Dearborn at 5%, compared to 3% in Washington.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Washington at 1% compared to 0% in Dearborn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washington | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 24.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 43.3% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Dearborn
- In Dearborn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.3% in Washington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Dearborn at 26.6% versus 22.8% in Washington.
- Dearborn has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 21.9% in Washington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Dearborn at 17.6% compared to 14.7% in Washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 43.3% compared to 34.2% in Dearborn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Dearborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washington | Dearborn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (128) | 2.8% (3,058) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (2,058) | 12.3% (13,249) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (1,487) | 17.5% (18,849) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.3% (1,118) | 21.3% (22,938) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Dearborn
- In Dearborn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.2% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 12.3% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Dearborn at 17.5%, compared to 13.7% in Washington.
- In Dearborn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 10.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.