Demographics details for Washington, MO vs Riverside, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Washington, MO vs Riverside, CA.

Data Washington Riverside
Population 15,075 320,764
Median Age 40.9 years 32.4 years
Median Income $75,127 $83,448
Married Families 41.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 8% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.9

Population Comparison: Washington vs Riverside

  • The population in Riverside is higher at 320,764, compared to 15,075 in Washington.
  • Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 32.4 years in Riverside.
  • Riverside has a higher median income of $83,448, compared to $75,127 in Washington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Washington at 41.0% compared to 33.0% in Riverside.
  • The poverty level is higher in Riverside at 12%, compared to 8% in Washington.
  • Riverside has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 2.5% in Washington.

Demographics

Demographics Washington vs Riverside provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Washington Riverside
Black Data is updating 6
White 91 18
Asian Data is updating 8
Hispanic 2 55
Two or More Races 7 12
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Riverside

  • In Riverside, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Washington.
  • Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 18% in Riverside.
  • In Riverside, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Washington.
  • Riverside has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 2% in Washington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Riverside at 12%, compared to 7% in Washington.
  • In Riverside, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Washington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Washington Riverside
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 16.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.0% 11.7%
Depression 24.6% 17.1%
Smoking 18.3% 13.2%
Binge Drinking 19.8% 16.1%
Obesity 36.6% 36.2%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Riverside

  • More residents in Washington report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.0% in Riverside.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 24.6% compared to 17.1% in Riverside.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 18.3% compared to 13.2% in Riverside.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 19.8% compared to 16.1% in Riverside.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 36.6% compared to 36.2% in Riverside.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverside.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Washington Riverside
No Schooling 0.3% (41) 2.0% (6,286)
High School Diploma 15.0% (2,260) 15.7% (50,271)
Less than High School 8.7% (1,311) 20.3% (64,976)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.8% (2,838) 14.9% (47,929)

Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Riverside

  • In Riverside, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.3% in Washington.
  • In Riverside, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 15.0% in Washington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Riverside at 20.3%, compared to 8.7% in Washington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 14.9% in Riverside.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.