Demographics details for Washington, MO vs Richmond hill, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Washington, MO vs Richmond hill, GA.

Data Washington Richmond hill
Population 15,075 18,091
Median Age 40.9 years 31.0 years
Median Income $75,127 $83,519
Married Families 41.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 8% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Washington vs Richmond hill

  • The population in Richmond hill is higher at 18,091, compared to 15,075 in Washington.
  • Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 31.0 years in Richmond hill.
  • Richmond hill has a higher median income of $83,519, compared to $75,127 in Washington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Washington at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Richmond hill.
  • The poverty level is higher in Richmond hill at 10%, compared to 8% in Washington.
  • Richmond hill has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Washington.

Demographics

Demographics Washington vs Richmond hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Washington Richmond hill
Black Data is updating 13
White 91 66
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 2 11
Two or More Races 7 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Richmond hill

  • In Richmond hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in Washington.
  • Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 66% in Richmond hill.
  • In Richmond hill, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Washington.
  • Richmond hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 2% in Washington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richmond hill at 8%, compared to 7% in Washington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Washington and Richmond hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Washington Richmond hill
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 15.9%
Physical Health Not Good 11.0% 10.6%
Depression 24.6% 21.8%
Smoking 18.3% 14.2%
Binge Drinking 19.8% 16.2%
Obesity 36.6% 34.4%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Richmond hill

  • More residents in Washington report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.9% in Richmond hill.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 24.6% compared to 21.8% in Richmond hill.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 18.3% compared to 14.2% in Richmond hill.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 19.8% compared to 16.2% in Richmond hill.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 36.6% compared to 34.4% in Richmond hill.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Richmond hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Washington Richmond hill
No Schooling 0.3% (41) 0.0% (9)
High School Diploma 15.0% (2,260) 7.7% (1,395)
Less than High School 8.7% (1,311) 5.7% (1,037)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.8% (2,838) 19.5% (3,532)

Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Richmond hill

  • A higher percentage of residents in Washington have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Richmond hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 7.7% in Richmond hill.
  • More residents in Washington have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 5.7% in Richmond hill.
  • In Richmond hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 18.8% in Washington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.