Demographics details for Washington, MO vs Griffin, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, MO vs Griffin, GA.
| Data | Washington | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,075 | 23,693 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $75,127 | $42,047 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Griffin
- The population in Griffin is higher at 23,693, compared to 15,075 in Washington.
- Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 33.2 years in Griffin.
- Washington has a higher median income of $75,127 compared to $42,047 in Griffin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Washington at 41.0% compared to 26.0% in Griffin.
- The poverty level is higher in Griffin at 15%, compared to 8% in Washington.
- Griffin has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washington | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 52 |
| White | 91 | 36 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Griffin
- In Griffin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 36% in Griffin.
- In Griffin, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Washington.
- Griffin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Washington at 7% compared to 5% in Griffin.
- In Griffin, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washington | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 13.4% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 16.8% in Washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 24.6% compared to 19.7% in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 18.3% in Washington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 19.8% compared to 13.4% in Griffin.
- Griffin has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 36.6% in Washington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Griffin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washington | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (41) | 2.2% (517) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (2,260) | 22.6% (5,347) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (1,311) | 16.3% (3,859) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.8% (2,838) | 11.9% (2,819) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.3% in Washington.
- In Griffin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 15.0% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Griffin at 16.3%, compared to 8.7% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 11.9% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.