Demographics details for Washington, MO vs Catawba, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, MO vs Catawba, SC.
| Data | Washington | Catawba |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,075 | 1,439 |
| Median Age | 40.9 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $75,127 | $50,920 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Catawba
- In Washington, the population is higher at 15,075, compared to 1,439 in Catawba.
- Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 40.9 years compared to 32.7 years in Catawba.
- Washington has a higher median income of $75,127 compared to $50,920 in Catawba.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Washington at 41.0% compared to 33.0% in Catawba.
- The poverty level is higher in Catawba at 12%, compared to 8% in Washington.
- Catawba has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Catawba provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washington | Catawba |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 23 |
| White | 91 | 63 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Catawba
- In Catawba, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 63% in Catawba.
- In Catawba, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Washington.
- Catawba has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Washington at 7% compared to 4% in Catawba.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Washington and Catawba at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washington | Catawba |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 18.3% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Catawba
- In Catawba, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.8% in Washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 24.6% compared to 22.2% in Catawba.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 18.3% compared to 17.0% in Catawba.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 19.8% compared to 18.3% in Catawba.
- Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 36.6% compared to 34.8% in Catawba.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Catawba.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washington | Catawba |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (41) | 0.1% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 15.0% (2,260) | 11.5% (166) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (1,311) | 15.7% (226) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.8% (2,838) | 21.5% (310) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Catawba
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Catawba.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 11.5% in Catawba.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Catawba at 15.7%, compared to 8.7% in Washington.
- In Catawba, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 18.8% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.