Demographics details for Washington, MO vs Brundidge, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, MO vs Brundidge, AL.
Data | Washington | Brundidge |
---|---|---|
Population | 15,075 | 2,034 |
Median Age | 40.9 years | 49.9 years |
Median Income | $75,127 | $37,627 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Brundidge
- In Washington, the population is higher at 15,075, compared to 2,034 in Brundidge.
- The median age in Brundidge is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 40.9 years in Washington.
- Washington has a higher median income of $75,127 compared to $37,627 in Brundidge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Washington at 41.0% compared to 39.0% in Brundidge.
- The poverty level is higher in Brundidge at 20%, compared to 8% in Washington.
- Brundidge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.5% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Brundidge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Washington | Brundidge |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 67 |
White | 91 | 12 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Brundidge
- In Brundidge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 67% compared to 0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 12% in Brundidge.
- Both Washington and Brundidge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Brundidge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 2% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Washington at 7% compared to 5% in Brundidge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Washington and Brundidge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Washington | Brundidge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 20.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 15.2% |
Depression | 24.6% | 20.7% |
Smoking | 18.3% | 23.1% |
Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 12.2% |
Obesity | 36.6% | 45.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Brundidge
- In Brundidge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 16.8% in Washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 24.6% compared to 20.7% in Brundidge.
- Brundidge has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 18.3% in Washington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 19.8% compared to 12.2% in Brundidge.
- Brundidge has higher obesity rates at 45.7% compared to 36.6% in Washington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brundidge at 25.0% compared to 14.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Washington | Brundidge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (41) | 0.5% (11) |
High School Diploma | 15.0% (2,260) | 35.9% (731) |
Less than High School | 8.7% (1,311) | 22.7% (461) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.8% (2,838) | 11.8% (240) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Brundidge
- In Brundidge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Washington.
- In Brundidge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.9% compared to 15.0% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brundidge at 22.7%, compared to 8.7% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 11.8% in Brundidge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.