Demographics details for Washington, LA vs Port gibson, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, LA vs Port gibson, MS.
| Data | Washington | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 726 | 1,206 |
| Median Age | 26.6 years | 47.3 years |
| Median Income | $36,719 | $24,773 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Port gibson
- The population in Port gibson is higher at 1,206, compared to 726 in Washington.
- The median age in Port gibson is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 26.6 years in Washington.
- Washington has a higher median income of $36,719 compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Washington at 23.0% compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- The poverty level is higher in Port gibson at 30%, compared to 15% in Washington.
- Port gibson has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 5.2% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Port gibson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washington | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 65 | 82 |
| White | 20 | 12 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 82% compared to 65% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 20% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- Both Washington and Port gibson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Washington at 3% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Washington at 12% compared to 6% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Washington and Port gibson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washington | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 26.0% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 10.2% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 50.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Port gibson
- More residents in Washington report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 19.0% in Port gibson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 25.5% compared to 20.0% in Port gibson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 26.0% compared to 24.8% in Port gibson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 15.1% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 41.5% in Washington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 9.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washington | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 20.2% (147) | 9.8% (118) |
| Less than High School | 27.7% (201) | 13.3% (160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (53) | 21.2% (256) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 20.2% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- More residents in Washington have less than a high school education at 27.7% compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
- In Port gibson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 7.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.