Demographics details for Washington, LA vs Middleport, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, LA vs Middleport, OH.
Data | Washington | Middleport |
---|---|---|
Population | 726 | 2,180 |
Median Age | 26.6 years | 42.5 years |
Median Income | $36,719 | $36,343 |
Married Families | 23.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Middleport
- The population in Middleport is higher at 2,180, compared to 726 in Washington.
- The median age in Middleport is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 26.6 years in Washington.
- Washington has a higher median income of $36,719 compared to $36,343 in Middleport.
- In Middleport, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 23.0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Middleport.
- The unemployment rate in Washington is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Middleport.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Middleport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Washington | Middleport |
---|---|---|
Black | 65 | 2 |
White | 20 | 91 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 12 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Middleport
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Washington at 65% compared to 2% in Middleport.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Middleport at 91% compared to 20% in Washington.
- Both Washington and Middleport have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Washington at 3% compared to 0% in Middleport.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Washington at 12% compared to 7% in Middleport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Washington and Middleport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Washington | Middleport |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 21.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 16.1% |
Depression | 25.5% | 27.5% |
Smoking | 26.0% | 30.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 41.5% | 41.6% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 29.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Middleport
- In Middleport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 21.1% in Washington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Middleport at 27.5% versus 25.5% in Washington.
- Middleport has a higher smoking rate at 30.0% compared to 26.0% in Washington.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Middleport at 16.4% compared to 15.1% in Washington.
- Middleport has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 41.5% in Washington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Middleport at 29.0% compared to 9.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Washington | Middleport |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.7% (36) |
High School Diploma | 20.2% (147) | 23.5% (512) |
Less than High School | 27.7% (201) | 19.8% (432) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.3% (53) | 7.8% (169) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Middleport
- In Middleport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Washington.
- In Middleport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 20.2% in Washington.
- More residents in Washington have less than a high school education at 27.7% compared to 19.8% in Middleport.
- In Middleport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.8% compared to 7.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.