Demographics details for Washington, KS vs Riverton, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Washington, KS vs Riverton, UT.

Data Washington Riverton
Population 5,501 44,599
Median Age 44.9 years 33.4 years
Median Income $59,432 $115,869
Married Families 46.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 12% 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 3.3

Population Comparison: Washington vs Riverton

  • The population in Riverton is higher at 44,599, compared to 5,501 in Washington.
  • Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 33.4 years in Riverton.
  • Riverton has a higher median income of $115,869, compared to $59,432 in Washington.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Washington and Riverton at 46.0%.
  • Washington has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Riverton.
  • Riverton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 3.0% in Washington.

Demographics

Demographics Washington vs Riverton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Washington Riverton
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 93 81
Asian 1 3
Hispanic 4 11
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Riverton

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Washington and Riverton at 0%.
  • Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 81% in Riverton.
  • In Riverton, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Washington.
  • Riverton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 4% in Washington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Riverton at 4%, compared to 2% in Washington.
  • In Riverton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Washington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Washington Riverton
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 17.2%
Physical Health Not Good 10.1% 9.3%
Depression 20.9% 27.1%
Smoking 18.8% 7.9%
Binge Drinking 20.4% 17.0%
Obesity 42.1% 28.9%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Riverton

  • In Riverton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.8% in Washington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Riverton at 27.1% versus 20.9% in Washington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 18.8% compared to 7.9% in Riverton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 20.4% compared to 17.0% in Riverton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 42.1% compared to 28.9% in Riverton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Riverton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Washington Riverton
No Schooling 0.8% (45) 1.2% (526)
High School Diploma 24.9% (1,368) 11.3% (5,043)
Less than High School 9.0% (494) 9.0% (4,024)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.8% (869) 22.8% (10,164)

Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Riverton

  • In Riverton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Washington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 11.3% in Riverton.
  • Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 9.0%.
  • In Riverton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.8% compared to 15.8% in Washington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.