Demographics details for Washington, KS vs Bloomfield, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, KS vs Bloomfield, KY.
Data | Washington | Bloomfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,501 | 970 |
Median Age | 44.9 years | 52.4 years |
Median Income | $59,432 | $44,922 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 49.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Bloomfield
- In Washington, the population is higher at 5,501, compared to 970 in Bloomfield.
- The median age in Bloomfield is higher at 52.4 years, compared to 44.9 years in Washington.
- Washington has a higher median income of $59,432 compared to $44,922 in Bloomfield.
- In Bloomfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 46.0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Bloomfield.
- Bloomfield has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Bloomfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Washington | Bloomfield |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 93 | 94 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Bloomfield
- In Bloomfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bloomfield at 94% compared to 93% in Washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Washington at 1% compared to 0% in Bloomfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Washington at 4% compared to 1% in Bloomfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bloomfield at 3%, compared to 2% in Washington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Washington and Bloomfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Washington | Bloomfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 14.0% |
Depression | 20.9% | 27.4% |
Smoking | 18.8% | 22.2% |
Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 42.1% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 29.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Bloomfield
- In Bloomfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.8% in Washington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bloomfield at 27.4% versus 20.9% in Washington.
- Bloomfield has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 18.8% in Washington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 20.4% compared to 15.6% in Bloomfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 42.1% compared to 38.5% in Bloomfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bloomfield at 29.0% compared to 14.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Washington | Bloomfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (45) | 0.5% (5) |
High School Diploma | 24.9% (1,368) | 19.7% (191) |
Less than High School | 9.0% (494) | 14.2% (138) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (869) | 19.3% (187) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Bloomfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Bloomfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 19.7% in Bloomfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bloomfield at 14.2%, compared to 9.0% in Washington.
- In Bloomfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 15.8% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.