Demographics details for Washington, IN vs Vancleave, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, IN vs Vancleave, MS.
| Data | Washington | Vancleave |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,171 | 5,207 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 37.7 years |
| Median Income | $48,255 | $72,576 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Vancleave
- In Washington, the population is higher at 12,171, compared to 5,207 in Vancleave.
- The median age in Vancleave is higher at 37.7 years, compared to 37.0 years in Washington.
- Vancleave has a higher median income of $72,576, compared to $48,255 in Washington.
- In Vancleave, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 38.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Vancleave at 13%, compared to 12% in Washington.
- Vancleave has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Vancleave provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washington | Vancleave |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 5 |
| White | 76 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Vancleave
- In Vancleave, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in Washington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Vancleave at 92% compared to 76% in Washington.
- Both Washington and Vancleave have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Washington at 12% compared to 1% in Vancleave.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Washington at 8% compared to 2% in Vancleave.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Washington and Vancleave at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washington | Vancleave |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 33.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Vancleave
- More residents in Washington report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.2% in Vancleave.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 27.6% compared to 23.7% in Vancleave.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 23.3% compared to 17.6% in Vancleave.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Vancleave at 17.1% compared to 16.3% in Washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 36.4% compared to 33.0% in Vancleave.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Vancleave.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washington | Vancleave |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (163) | 1.3% (67) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (2,771) | 14.7% (765) |
| Less than High School | 20.2% (2,460) | 8.5% (445) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (1,129) | 17.0% (884) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Vancleave
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Washington and Vancleave at 1.3%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 14.7% in Vancleave.
- More residents in Washington have less than a high school education at 20.2% compared to 8.5% in Vancleave.
- In Vancleave, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.0% compared to 9.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.