Demographics details for Washington, IN vs San angelo, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, IN vs San angelo, TX.
| Data | Washington | San angelo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,171 | 99,112 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $48,255 | $65,040 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs San angelo
- The population in San angelo is higher at 99,112, compared to 12,171 in Washington.
- Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 34.7 years in San angelo.
- San angelo has a higher median income of $65,040, compared to $48,255 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Washington at 38.0% compared to 37.0% in San angelo.
- The poverty level is higher in San angelo at 13%, compared to 12% in Washington.
- San angelo has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.2% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs San angelo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washington | San angelo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 5 |
| White | 76 | 33 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 44 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs San angelo
- In San angelo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 33% in San angelo.
- In San angelo, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Washington.
- San angelo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44%, compared to 12% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San angelo at 16%, compared to 8% in Washington.
- In San angelo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washington | San angelo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 16.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs San angelo
- More residents in Washington report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.2% in San angelo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 27.6% compared to 23.9% in San angelo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 23.3% compared to 16.3% in San angelo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in San angelo at 18.3% compared to 16.3% in Washington.
- San angelo has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 36.4% in Washington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in San angelo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washington | San angelo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (163) | 1.5% (1,444) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (2,771) | 14.0% (13,867) |
| Less than High School | 20.2% (2,460) | 17.7% (17,520) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (1,129) | 15.8% (15,619) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs San angelo
- In San angelo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 1.3% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 14.0% in San angelo.
- More residents in Washington have less than a high school education at 20.2% compared to 17.7% in San angelo.
- In San angelo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 9.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.