Demographics details for Washington, IN vs Rialto, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, IN vs Rialto, CA.
| Data | Washington | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,171 | 103,545 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 31.2 years |
| Median Income | $48,255 | $80,750 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Rialto
- The population in Rialto is higher at 103,545, compared to 12,171 in Washington.
- Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 31.2 years in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher median income of $80,750, compared to $48,255 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Washington at 38.0% compared to 33.0% in Rialto.
- The poverty level is higher in Rialto at 18%, compared to 12% in Washington.
- Rialto has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.2% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Rialto provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washington | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 12 |
| White | 76 | -7 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Rialto
- In Rialto, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 4% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to -7% in Rialto.
- In Rialto, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Washington.
- Rialto has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 12% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rialto at 17%, compared to 8% in Washington.
- In Rialto, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washington | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 13.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Rialto
- More residents in Washington report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 17.1% in Rialto.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 27.6% compared to 17.5% in Rialto.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 23.3% compared to 13.8% in Rialto.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 16.3% compared to 14.8% in Rialto.
- Rialto has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 36.4% in Washington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Rialto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washington | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (163) | 2.7% (2,754) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (2,771) | 18.6% (19,301) |
| Less than High School | 20.2% (2,460) | 30.0% (31,028) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (1,129) | 7.5% (7,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Rialto
- In Rialto, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.3% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 18.6% in Rialto.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rialto at 30.0%, compared to 20.2% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 7.5% in Rialto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.