Demographics details for Washington, IN vs Pulaski, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, IN vs Pulaski, WI.
| Data | Washington | Pulaski |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,171 | 4,045 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 29.1 years |
| Median Income | $48,255 | $65,906 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Pulaski
- In Washington, the population is higher at 12,171, compared to 4,045 in Pulaski.
- Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 29.1 years in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher median income of $65,906, compared to $48,255 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Washington at 38.0% compared to 28.0% in Pulaski.
- Washington has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Pulaski.
- Pulaski has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Pulaski provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washington | Pulaski |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 1 |
| White | 76 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Pulaski
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Washington at 4% compared to 1% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pulaski at 84% compared to 76% in Washington.
- In Pulaski, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Washington at 12% compared to 2% in Pulaski.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pulaski at 10%, compared to 8% in Washington.
- In Pulaski, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washington | Pulaski |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 9.4% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 24.7% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 35.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Pulaski
- More residents in Washington report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 14.5% in Pulaski.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 27.6% compared to 22.4% in Pulaski.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 23.3% compared to 14.6% in Pulaski.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pulaski at 24.7% compared to 16.3% in Washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 36.4% compared to 35.4% in Pulaski.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Pulaski.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washington | Pulaski |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (163) | 0.4% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (2,771) | 17.7% (715) |
| Less than High School | 20.2% (2,460) | 4.7% (191) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (1,129) | 10.7% (432) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Pulaski
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Pulaski.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 17.7% in Pulaski.
- More residents in Washington have less than a high school education at 20.2% compared to 4.7% in Pulaski.
- In Pulaski, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.7% compared to 9.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.