Demographics details for Washington, IN vs Murfreesboro, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, IN vs Murfreesboro, TN.
Data | Washington | Murfreesboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,171 | 162,398 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 31.5 years |
Median Income | $48,255 | $70,451 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Murfreesboro
- The population in Murfreesboro is higher at 162,398, compared to 12,171 in Washington.
- Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 31.5 years in Murfreesboro.
- Murfreesboro has a higher median income of $70,451, compared to $48,255 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Washington at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Murfreesboro.
- Washington has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Murfreesboro.
- The unemployment rate in Washington is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.0% in Murfreesboro.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Murfreesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Washington | Murfreesboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 17 |
White | 76 | 66 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 12 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Murfreesboro
- In Murfreesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 4% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 66% in Murfreesboro.
- In Murfreesboro, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Washington at 12% compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Washington at 8% compared to 7% in Murfreesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Washington and Murfreesboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Washington | Murfreesboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 11.6% |
Depression | 27.6% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 23.3% | 18.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 15.5% |
Obesity | 36.4% | 34.8% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Murfreesboro
- More residents in Washington report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 18.1% in Murfreesboro.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 27.6% compared to 26.5% in Murfreesboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 23.3% compared to 18.3% in Murfreesboro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 16.3% compared to 15.5% in Murfreesboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 36.4% compared to 34.8% in Murfreesboro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Murfreesboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Washington | Murfreesboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (163) | 0.6% (920) |
High School Diploma | 22.8% (2,771) | 10.7% (17,362) |
Less than High School | 20.2% (2,460) | 6.2% (10,101) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (1,129) | 23.4% (38,019) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Murfreesboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.6% in Murfreesboro.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 10.7% in Murfreesboro.
- More residents in Washington have less than a high school education at 20.2% compared to 6.2% in Murfreesboro.
- In Murfreesboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 9.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.