Demographics details for Washington, IN vs Galveston, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, IN vs Galveston, TX.
Data | Washington | Galveston |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,171 | 53,089 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 39.4 years |
Median Income | $48,255 | $57,453 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Galveston
- The population in Galveston is higher at 53,089, compared to 12,171 in Washington.
- The median age in Galveston is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 37.0 years in Washington.
- Galveston has a higher median income of $57,453, compared to $48,255 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Washington at 38.0% compared to 34.0% in Galveston.
- The poverty level is higher in Galveston at 16%, compared to 12% in Washington.
- Galveston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.2% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Galveston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Washington | Galveston |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 16 |
White | 76 | 37 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 12 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Galveston
- In Galveston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 4% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 37% in Galveston.
- In Galveston, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Washington.
- Galveston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 12% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Galveston at 13%, compared to 8% in Washington.
- In Galveston, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Washington | Galveston |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 12.3% |
Depression | 27.6% | 21.7% |
Smoking | 23.3% | 16.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 36.4% | 37.4% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Galveston
- More residents in Washington report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.9% in Galveston.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 27.6% compared to 21.7% in Galveston.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 23.3% compared to 16.9% in Galveston.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Galveston at 16.8% compared to 16.3% in Washington.
- Galveston has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 36.4% in Washington.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Washington and Galveston at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Washington | Galveston |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (163) | 1.6% (823) |
High School Diploma | 22.8% (2,771) | 13.8% (7,336) |
Less than High School | 20.2% (2,460) | 16.6% (8,791) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (1,129) | 23.2% (12,311) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Galveston
- In Galveston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.3% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 13.8% in Galveston.
- More residents in Washington have less than a high school education at 20.2% compared to 16.6% in Galveston.
- In Galveston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 9.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.