Demographics details for Washington, IN vs Fort thomas, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, IN vs Fort thomas, KY.
| Data | Washington | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,171 | 17,133 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $48,255 | $95,391 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Fort thomas
- The population in Fort thomas is higher at 17,133, compared to 12,171 in Washington.
- The median age in Fort thomas is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 37.0 years in Washington.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391, compared to $48,255 in Washington.
- In Fort thomas, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 38.0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
- The unemployment rate in Washington is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Fort thomas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washington | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 2 |
| White | 76 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Fort thomas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Washington at 4% compared to 2% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort thomas at 92% compared to 76% in Washington.
- In Fort thomas, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Washington at 12% compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Washington at 8% compared to 4% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Washington and Fort thomas at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washington | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Fort thomas
- More residents in Washington report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 27.6% compared to 26.2% in Fort thomas.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 23.3% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort thomas at 17.1% compared to 16.3% in Washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 36.4% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washington | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (163) | 0.4% (66) |
| High School Diploma | 22.8% (2,771) | 10.7% (1,840) |
| Less than High School | 20.2% (2,460) | 3.3% (569) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (1,129) | 37.3% (6,383) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Fort thomas
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.4% in Fort thomas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- More residents in Washington have less than a high school education at 20.2% compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
- In Fort thomas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 9.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.