Demographics details for Washington, IN vs Cedar grove, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Washington, IN vs Cedar grove, NJ.

Data Washington Cedar grove
Population 12,171 12,549
Median Age 37.0 years 42.5 years
Median Income $48,255 $107,500
Married Families 38.0% 68.2%
Poverty Level 12% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.3

Population Comparison: Washington vs Cedar grove

  • The population in Cedar grove is higher at 12,549, compared to 12,171 in Washington.
  • The median age in Cedar grove is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 37.0 years in Washington.
  • Cedar grove has a higher median income of $107,500, compared to $48,255 in Washington.
  • In Cedar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 68.2%, compared to 38.0% in Washington.
  • Washington has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Cedar grove.
  • Cedar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 3.3% compared to 3.2% in Washington.

Demographics

Demographics Washington vs Cedar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Washington Cedar grove
Black 4 1.2
White 76 89.5
Asian Data is updating 5.2
Hispanic 12 3.1
Two or More Races 8 1.0
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Cedar grove

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Washington at 4% compared to 1.2% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar grove at 89.5% compared to 76% in Washington.
  • In Cedar grove, the Asian population stands at 5.2%, greater than 0% in Washington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Washington at 12% compared to 3.1% in Cedar grove.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Washington at 8% compared to 1.0% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Washington and Cedar grove at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Washington Cedar grove
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 13.5% Data is updating%
Depression 27.6% Data is updating%
Smoking 23.3% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.3% Data is updating%
Obesity 36.4% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 16.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Cedar grove

  • More residents in Washington report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Washington at 27.6% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Washington at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Washington at 36.4% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Washington at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Washington Cedar grove
No Schooling 1.3% (163) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 22.8% (2,771) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 20.2% (2,460) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.3% (1,129) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Cedar grove

  • A higher percentage of residents in Washington have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a high school diploma at 22.8% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • More residents in Washington have less than a high school education at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 0.0% in Cedar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.