Demographics details for Washington, DC vs Harlingen, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, DC vs Harlingen, TX.
| Data | Washington | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 671,803 | 71,678 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $101,722 | $50,367 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Harlingen
- In Washington, the population is higher at 671,803, compared to 71,678 in Harlingen.
- Residents in Washington have a higher median age of 34.8 years compared to 33.2 years in Harlingen.
- Washington has a higher median income of $101,722 compared to $50,367 in Harlingen.
- In Harlingen, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 26.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is identical in both Washington and Harlingen at 18%.
- The unemployment rate in Washington is higher at 6.3%, compared to 5.9% in Harlingen.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Harlingen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washington | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 44 | 2 |
| White | 34 | -5 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 83 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Harlingen
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Washington at 44% compared to 2% in Harlingen.
- Washington has a higher percentage of White residents at 34% compared to -5% in Harlingen.
- The Asian population is larger in Washington at 4% compared to 1% in Harlingen.
- Harlingen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 83%, compared to 11% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harlingen at 19%, compared to 7% in Washington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Washington and Harlingen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washington | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.0% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.7% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 25.6% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Harlingen
- In Harlingen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.0% in Washington.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 20.1%.
- Harlingen has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 12.4% in Washington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 20.7% compared to 16.3% in Harlingen.
- Harlingen has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 25.6% in Washington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harlingen at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washington | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (6,109) | 2.1% (1,536) |
| High School Diploma | 9.1% (61,269) | 13.6% (9,737) |
| Less than High School | 6.8% (45,577) | 26.2% (18,783) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.2% (303,532) | 12.8% (9,208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Harlingen
- In Harlingen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.9% in Washington.
- In Harlingen, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.6% compared to 9.1% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harlingen at 26.2%, compared to 6.8% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.2% compared to 12.8% in Harlingen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.