Or Compare Two Places

Demographics details for Washington, DC vs Fitzgerald, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Washington, DC vs Fitzgerald, GA.

Data Washington Fitzgerald
Population 671,803 8,900
Median Age 34.8 years 35.3 years
Median Income $101,722 $32,500
Married Families 26.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 18% 18%
Unemployment Rate 6.3 4.5

Population Comparison: Washington vs Fitzgerald

  • In Washington, the population is higher at 671,803, compared to 8,900 in Fitzgerald.
  • The median age in Fitzgerald is higher at 35.3 years, compared to 34.8 years in Washington.
  • Washington has a higher median income of $101,722 compared to $32,500 in Fitzgerald.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Washington and Fitzgerald at 26.0%.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Washington and Fitzgerald at 18%.
  • The unemployment rate in Washington is higher at 6.3%, compared to 4.5% in Fitzgerald.

Demographics

Demographics Washington vs Fitzgerald provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Washington Fitzgerald
Black 44 55
White 34 42
Asian 4 1
Hispanic 11 1
Two or More Races 7 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Fitzgerald

  • In Fitzgerald, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 44% in Washington.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fitzgerald at 42% compared to 34% in Washington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Washington at 4% compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Washington at 11% compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Washington at 7% compared to 1% in Fitzgerald.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Washington and Fitzgerald at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Washington Fitzgerald
Mental Health Not Good 14.0% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 8.6% 15.1%
Depression 20.1% 22.4%
Smoking 12.4% 22.9%
Binge Drinking 20.7% 13.4%
Obesity 25.6% 45.0%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Fitzgerald

  • In Fitzgerald, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 14.0% in Washington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Fitzgerald at 22.4% versus 20.1% in Washington.
  • Fitzgerald has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 12.4% in Washington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 20.7% compared to 13.4% in Fitzgerald.
  • Fitzgerald has higher obesity rates at 45.0% compared to 25.6% in Washington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fitzgerald at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Washington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Washington Fitzgerald
No Schooling 0.9% (6,109) 0.5% (41)
High School Diploma 9.1% (61,269) 32.9% (2,930)
Less than High School 6.8% (45,577) 11.1% (992)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 45.2% (303,532) 9.3% (828)

Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Fitzgerald

  • A higher percentage of residents in Washington have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Fitzgerald.
  • In Fitzgerald, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.9% compared to 9.1% in Washington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fitzgerald at 11.1%, compared to 6.8% in Washington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.2% compared to 9.3% in Fitzgerald.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.