Demographics details for Washington, DC vs Federal way, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washington, DC vs Federal way, WA.
| Data | Washington | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 671,803 | 97,863 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $101,722 | $80,360 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.3 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Washington vs Federal way
- In Washington, the population is higher at 671,803, compared to 97,863 in Federal way.
- The median age in Federal way is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 34.8 years in Washington.
- Washington has a higher median income of $101,722 compared to $80,360 in Federal way.
- In Federal way, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 26.0% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Federal way.
- The unemployment rate in Washington is higher at 6.3%, compared to 5.7% in Federal way.
Demographics
Demographics Washington vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washington | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 44 | 17 |
| White | 34 | 34 |
| Asian | 4 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Washington vs Federal way
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Washington at 44% compared to 17% in Federal way.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Washington and Federal way at 34%.
- In Federal way, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 4% in Washington.
- Federal way has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 11% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 7% in Washington.
- In Federal way, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washington | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.0% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.7% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 25.6% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washington vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 14.0% in Washington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Federal way at 24.7% versus 20.1% in Washington.
- Federal way has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 12.4% in Washington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washington at 20.7% compared to 16.5% in Federal way.
- Federal way has higher obesity rates at 27.2% compared to 25.6% in Washington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Federal way at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washington | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (6,109) | 1.8% (1,735) |
| High School Diploma | 9.1% (61,269) | 15.3% (15,003) |
| Less than High School | 6.8% (45,577) | 11.0% (10,805) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.2% (303,532) | 21.2% (20,761) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washington vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.9% in Washington.
- In Federal way, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 9.1% in Washington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Federal way at 11.0%, compared to 6.8% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.2% compared to 21.2% in Federal way.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.