Demographics details for Washburn, WI vs Orland park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washburn, WI vs Orland park, IL.
| Data | Washburn | Orland park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,911 | 57,511 |
| Median Age | 52.2 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $58,504 | $97,365 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Washburn vs Orland park
- The population in Orland park is higher at 57,511, compared to 16,911 in Washburn.
- Residents in Washburn have a higher median age of 52.2 years compared to 46.6 years in Orland park.
- Orland park has a higher median income of $97,365, compared to $58,504 in Washburn.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Washburn and Orland park at 48.0%.
- Washburn has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 6% in Orland park.
- Orland park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.3% in Washburn.
Demographics
Demographics Washburn vs Orland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washburn | Orland park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 92 | 76 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washburn vs Orland park
- In Orland park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Washburn.
- Washburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 76% in Orland park.
- In Orland park, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Washburn.
- Orland park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 2% in Washburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Orland park at 5%, compared to 3% in Washburn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Washburn at 1% compared to 0% in Orland park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washburn | Orland park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 11.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.4% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 34.0% | 26.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washburn vs Orland park
- More residents in Washburn report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 13.2% in Orland park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washburn at 24.3% compared to 18.2% in Orland park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washburn at 17.4% compared to 11.7% in Orland park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washburn at 23.4% compared to 20.2% in Orland park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Washburn at 34.0% compared to 26.8% in Orland park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washburn at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Orland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washburn | Orland park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (115) | 0.5% (297) |
| High School Diploma | 22.9% (3,881) | 16.1% (9,262) |
| Less than High School | 9.6% (1,628) | 8.3% (4,763) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (2,913) | 31.9% (18,372) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washburn vs Orland park
- A higher percentage of residents in Washburn have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Orland park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washburn hold a high school diploma at 22.9% compared to 16.1% in Orland park.
- More residents in Washburn have less than a high school education at 9.6% compared to 8.3% in Orland park.
- In Orland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.9% compared to 17.2% in Washburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.