Demographics details for Washburn, WI vs Lorida, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Washburn, WI vs Lorida, FL.
| Data | Washburn | Lorida |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,911 | 500 |
| Median Age | 52.2 years | 50.0 years |
| Median Income | $58,504 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 80.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Washburn vs Lorida
- In Washburn, the population is higher at 16,911, compared to 500 in Lorida.
- Residents in Washburn have a higher median age of 52.2 years compared to 50.0 years in Lorida.
- Lorida has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $58,504 in Washburn.
- In Lorida, the percentage of married families is higher at 80.0%, compared to 48.0% in Washburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Lorida at 12%, compared to 8% in Washburn.
- Lorida has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.3% in Washburn.
Demographics
Demographics Washburn vs Lorida provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Washburn | Lorida |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 92 | 95 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Washburn vs Lorida
- In Lorida, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Washburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lorida at 95% compared to 92% in Washburn.
- Both Washburn and Lorida have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Washburn and Lorida at 2%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Washburn at 3% compared to 0% in Lorida.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Washburn at 1% compared to 0% in Lorida.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Washburn | Lorida |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.4% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 34.0% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Washburn vs Lorida
- More residents in Washburn report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Lorida.
- Depression is more prevalent in Washburn at 24.3% compared to 0.0% in Lorida.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Washburn at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Lorida.
- Binge drinking is more common in Washburn at 23.4% compared to 0.0% in Lorida.
- Obesity rates are higher in Washburn at 34.0% compared to 0.0% in Lorida.
- Disability percentages are higher in Washburn at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Lorida.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Washburn | Lorida |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (115) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.9% (3,881) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 9.6% (1,628) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (2,913) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Washburn vs Lorida
- A higher percentage of residents in Washburn have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Lorida.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washburn hold a high school diploma at 22.9% compared to 0.0% in Lorida.
- More residents in Washburn have less than a high school education at 9.6% compared to 0.0% in Lorida.
- A higher percentage of residents in Washburn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Lorida.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.